Difference between Microevolution and Macroevolution

Key Difference: Microevolution is evolution or changes that occur in human time and are small changes that help organisms adapt to their surroundings. These changes could include color, size, etc. Macroevolution is changes that occur in geological time, more like 500-1000 years. They comprise of microevolution that takes place overtime.

Microevolution and macroevolution are two terms that you not only come across in the field of science but it is also very much a part of a person’s everyday life. The process of evolution is something that one encounter’s daily, even if the process is not visible. Evolution is the process by which something changes from one stage to the other, especially a more advanced or mature stage.

Microevolution is the change that occurs in the gene frequency of a population over a period of time. This change is related to four different processes that a living organism encounters: mutation, selection (natural and artificial), gene flow, and genetic drift. The branch of science that deals with the study of microevolution is known as ‘population genetics.’ Microevolution is the small changes that occur in a living organism that allows it to adapt and change according to its surroundings and circumstances.

The term ‘microevolution’ was first used by botanist Robert Greenleaf Leavitt in the journal

‘Botanical Gazette’ in 1909, addressing what he called the "mystery" of how formlessness gives rise to form. The description used by Leavitt is now known as developmental biology. The usage of the term was drastically changed when the word was used in accordance with ‘macroevolution’ by Russian Entomologist, Yuri Filipchenko in 1927 in his German language work, "Variabilität und Variation". The term was later carried into the English usage by Theodosius Dobzhansky in his 1937 book Genetics and the Origin of Species.

Microevolution is observable over short periods of time and can be affected by changing of the DNA sequence of a cell's genome. Changes can be caused by radiation, viruses, transposons and mutagenic chemicals, as well as errors that occur during meiosis or DNA replication. These changes or errors in a cell are known as mutation, which help the cell adapt in hostile situations. Error rates are usually very low due to the "proofreading" ability of DNA polymerases. Other factors that can affect microevolution are the Darwin’s theory of natural selection or artificial selection, which allows organisms to adapt traits that are more likely to help it survive. An example of microevolution includes crop pests to become immune to pesticides after a prolonged use.

In contrary to microevolution, macroevolution deals with evolution on a larger and grander scale. It refers to change that occurs at or above the level of species or abrupt transformations from one biologic system to another. Paleontology, evolutionary developmental biology, comparative genomics and genomic phylostratigraphy help contribute evidence in order to prove the existence of microevolution. Microevolution is believed to take hundreds or thousands of years to occur.

Macroevolution is not easy to see as there are not first-hand accounts of such mutations on a grander scale, however evidence from bones, DNA and fossils have given us enough proof in order to create an exact timeline to place the events in history. Similar factors that affect microevolution such as mutation, migration, genetic drift, and natural selection, also affect macroevolution and produce major evolutionary changes when given time. Visible patterns in macroevolution include stasis (remain unchanged for long period of time, like trees), Character change (lineages can change fast or slow depending on the surroundings), Lineage-splitting (lineages can split into two different species, such as various plants and animals that belong to the same family), and extinction (where the species officially dies out when it cannot adapt).

The term ‘macroevolution’ was first coined by Yuri Filipchenko and the meaning of the two words microevolution and macroevolution has been revised several times before receiving its current definition. The term macroevolution fell in limited disfavor when it was taken over by geneticist Richard Goldschmidt and the paleontologist Otto Schindewolf to describe their orthogenetic theories. The practical definition of the term describes the changes that occur on geological time scales. Example of macroevolution includes the Cambrian Explosion, changes in biodiversity through time, genomic evolution, mass extinctions, etc.  The best possible way to explain macroevolution would be the evolution of humans from primates.

The terms microevolution and macroevolution are under constant scrutiny from the creationists. The world has been divided effectively into two kinds of people, the evolutionists and the creationists. The creationists agree with the theory of microevolution, however disregard the theory of macroevolution. Contrary to the beliefs of creationists, macroevolution has been proven in a controlled environment as well as nature. The creationists’ idea that humans have evolved from Adam and Eve allows them to support the idea of microevolution, but do not believe the evolution of humans from primates. Due to the constant scrutiny on the usage of these words, scientists use these words rarely and instead use evolution to describe changes in general.

In a nutshell, microevolution is evolution or changes that occur in human time and are small changes that help organisms adapt to their surroundings. These changes could include color, size, etc. Macroevolution is changes that occur in geological time, more like 500-1000 years. They comprise of microevolution that takes place overtime. They can include separation of species or new species being formed from an existing species.

Image Courtesy: berkeley.edu, makaylapo.blogspot.in

Most Searched in Business and Finance Most Searched in Pregnancy and Parenting
Most Searched in Food and Drink Most Searched in Education and References
Gopher vs Mole
Sony Xperia J vs LG Optimus F5
Learning Outcome vs Learning Objective
Open Heart Surgery vs Closed Heart Surgery

Add new comment

Plain text

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.